Rethinking Diet Culture and Embracing International No-Diet Day

May 6th marks International No-Diet Day (INDD) – an important occasion to reflect on the potential harms caused by weight loss dieting. Initiated by feminist groups in the UK in 1992 under the leadership of Mary Evans Young, INDD provides an opportunity for a number of important reflections:

  • Challenge cultural ideals: INDD encourages us to challenge societal norms surrounding body shape and size

  • Raise awareness: Shedding light on weight discrimination and fat phobia, advocating for greater acceptance and inclusivity

  • Combatting diet culture: iNDD prompts us to question the industries profiting from body dissatisfaction and dieting norms

  • Prioritising body liberation: The day emphasis the importance of freedom and liberation from societal beauty standards

As we acknowledge INDD this year, we’re reflecting on the bigger picture - the context in which diet culture (the pervasiveness of dieting norms and the perceived value of weight loss dieting) manifests in our communities. Weight loss dieting, often considered a solution for many grappling with body image issues, actually poses significant risks and harms, including:

  • Eating Disorders: Weight loss dieting is a significant risk factor for the development of an eating disorder

  • Health Issues: It can compromise nutritional adequacy and lead to multiple adverse health effects

  • Social Isolation: Dieting can be isolating, causing people to exclude themselves or withdraw from social occasions which involve food

  • Mental Health: Weight loss dieting exacerbates body dissatisfaction and distress, which has a cause-and-effect relationship with poor mental health outcomes such as depression and anxiety

  • Mind-Body Disconnection: Weight loss dieting teaches us to be at war with and to disconnect from our bodies - which has multiple adverse physical and psychological implications

  • Perpetuating Stigma: Weight loss dieting perpetuates weight stigma and weight bias

  • Financial Costs: Additionally, weight loss dieting incurs significant financial expenses *

It is essential though to acknowledge that many people turn to dieting as a means of regaining control in a world inundated with conflicting messages about nutrition and body image. Simply advising people to ‘stop dieting’ isn't enough; they need viable alternatives. Dr. Rick Kausman's question, ‘If Not Dieting, Then What?’ (also the title of his 2004 book) prompts us to explore alternatives which prioritise wellbeing over weight loss and recognise and respect the diversity of body types.

Zooming out to the societal level, it becomes evident that diet culture thrives within a context of weight stigma, bias, and weight normativity.

  • Weight bias – negative assumptions and judgements about people in larger bodies

  • Weight stigma – social devaluation and discrimination based on weight and shape

  • Weight-normativity - emphasises weight and weight loss as central to defining health and wellbeing (ie. Assumes health based on weight)

  • Weight-inclusivity – emphasises health and wellbeing as multifaceted and related to many aspects of a persons life (ie. Recognises social, emotional, physical and spiritual aspects, the importance of the whole person and the context in which they live)

It’s not enough to merely recommend to someone that they stop dieting… when we live in a weight-normative culture which tells us that thinner is better, and that we’re ‘wrong’ for existing in bodies which are anything other than the cultural ideal. Assumptions about weight and size need to be continually challenged and addressed, recognising that for many people, weight loss dieting makes sense as a response to the culture they exist within. It’s not enough to put the pressure on someone to change – it’s the culture that needs to change, to make it safe for people to exist in a diverse range of bodies, and to be valued and treated with respect without any expectation of a need to shrink their body in order to be OK.

Zooming in again to the individual level, we offer the following suggestions for potential alternatives to weight loss dieting. These are just suggestions… think about what works for you, and how you can ‘opt-out’ of diet culture… even if just for today:

  • Focus on taking care of your body, nourishing and nurturing it in ways that feel good for you. Go for a walk in nature, lay under a tree, have a long bath…

  • Explore your relationship with food, try to understand all the different motivations you have for eating, and bring self-compassionate awareness to those motivations

  • Eat for both pleasure and nourishment – consider the importance of nourishing yourself both physically and emotionally in many different ways

  • Celebrate and enjoy a wide range and variety of foods – allow yourself to really dive into the sensory pleasure which comes from fully experiencing food

  • Spend time with people who value and recognise you for who you are, seek out communities in which you feel safe

  • Expose yourself to diverse messages about bodies – do a social media audit and be ready to unfollow any accounts which perpetuate the ‘thin is best’ ideal, especially those which suggest there is any right’or wrong way of eating

  • If this is a particularly tricky issue for you seek out a Psychologist, Dietitian, or other health professional who can assist you to untangle and address the ways weight stigma and weight bias effects you, and who can help you explore alternatives to diet culture

Importantly… recognise messages of weight bias and stigma in your environment, and chose not to perpetuate them. If you have the energy to challenge these messages, then by all means do so - be a social justice campaigner and advocate for respect and inclusion for all people, regardless of the characteristics of their body.

All bodies are worthy of care and respect.

 

(* The global weight loss and weight management market value in 2021 was USD $224 billion USD, and by 2030 is predicted to be $405 billion USD (Source – Global News Wire February 9, 2023). This ‘market value’ is being paid for by the people who are driven by body dissatisfaction and distress to purchase products and methods they’re sold under the guise they will make them thinner, and happier. And this is just referring to the direct costs associated with dieting. It’s impossible to put a price on the costs of poor nutrition caused by restrictive eating, eating disorders triggered or exacerbated by the pursuit of thinness and body dissatisfaction which the diet industry profits from, and other mental health challenges exacerbated by weight stigma and weight bias.)

 

Related past articles: